Thread:Buddyn32/@comment-40245472-20200814034754/@comment-31634903-20200815030800

First of all you don't have to read, reply, or even aknolodge any of the following, but if you can't interpret my writing then let me(attempt to) put it in simple terms:

I never explicitly stated that I didn't read the rules. That was your first mistake. They are not very long and assuming I don't have the five minutes it takes to read them is very low of you and your colleagues. During this entire ordeal, I was entirely aware of what was deemed acceptable behaviour. The issue started when after a resolution was made, there was a failure of judgment on part of the admins of this wiki. Whether or not you would like to acknowledge that is completely up to you, but if you choose not to, then I can only hope you choose not to settle for a misinterpretation of the current situation.

Your oligarchy is not in danger, so I see no reason to reply, but I would suggest actually trying to understand my "random stuff" before attempting another shot at having the last word, as it seems that you don't have the common curtesy to actually read my replies as I did with your rules.

I understand I am coming on a bit strong, so let me extend an olive branch:

I'm assuming that you see me as a person who wouldn't put as much scrutiny into interpreting the rules as I would in my writing, and for what it's worth, that is correct. My version of a civil discussion is very, very, different from that of someone who doesn't take pride in their online communication (because, honestly, who would?). This is a byproduct of the way I was raised, but I am not ashamed of it. I made a mistake by assuming that someone not unlike yourself would care to speak with a person as crazy as I am. This was poor judgment on my part, as I've only ever met two people that could hold a converstion like this with me, and one of those people is my own father.

So for the two pennies it's worth, I apologize.