Thread:Buddyn32/@comment-40245472-20200814034754/@comment-31620988-20200815105924

"'I never explicitly stated that I didn't read the rules.'" You did not demonstrate having read them, therefore we assumed you didnt. I dont see how that's a mistake.

"'The issue started when after a resolution was made, there was a failure of judgment on part of the admins of this wiki.'" There wasnt a failure of judgement. Coldwhie stated after the resolution, in the same thread, that he'll still have to file a warning because of the rules.

The reason you were given a warning was because you lashed out at people instead of trying to resolve the issue and engaged in edit wars. You should know this is worthy of a warning after reading the rules, so why are you surprised you got a warning for it?

Being civil is not attacking people or being passive aggressive, not "If you can't say something nice, don't say nothing at all.":
 * Why would I stop correcting things that are incorrect. Thats stupid. :)
 * You must have some pretty serious trust issues, [...] because you are a dense creature
 * If you wan't to play god with semantics then go ahead, but if you are a respectable human being you will leave me alone.
 * but if you can't interpret my writing then let me put it in simple terms
 * I would suggest actually trying to understand my "random stuff" before attempting another shot at having the last word
 * it seems that you don't have the common curtesy to actually read my replies

I'm not trying to have the last word; how is one exactly supposed to interpret this and this? At every turn you type up long anecdotes that often don't have anything to do with the topic at hand; crying victim while you insult people passive aggressively for no good reason.

We would appreciate if this stopped, and that you instead focused on adding valuable edits to the wiki. Right now, less than 20% of your wiki contribs are actual edits, the rest is wall messages.