Thread:Mini39928/@comment-38252036-20190127231945/@comment-38252036-20190128015742

blah blah blah here's the confirmation for all of my claims:

https://youtu.be/BHxaPGuQY0A

And no, your/Mini's wording is just wrong, and there's nothing false about what I've stated. You first claimed that my wording implied it always blocked damage, and then told me that "may sounded vague," despite the fact that the usage of the word "may" is SPECIFICALLY what makes the sentence avoid implying the charm always blocks damage, as the word "may" SPECIFICALLY does NOT mean "nessecairaly." In other words, you're telling me the line is too determined despite the word "may," and then that it isn't determined enough because of the very same word! Don't touch my wording!

Furthermore, saying that it WILL INCREASE the probability IS-TO-SAY that it DEFINITELY will increase, which is FALSE. If you really take the word "can"/"may" to seem too probabilistic (which is fine because it actually is in this case, since melody is) at least use the word "advance" rather than "increase," since that can at least be interpreted to mean that you're advancing from 90% to another 90% given how the steps work, which is technically not wrong. Using "increase" and "will" together is just objectively false though.